Crypto Casino Complaint Cases cryptocasino.cc — the crypto casino complaints registry

Crypto Casino Complaints / BitStarz / Self-Exclusion Failures

BitStarz: Self-Exclusion Failures

Neither case has ended in the player's favour; 1 was rejected and 1 is still open.

Two cases on file about gambling harm at BitStarz. A player from Germany says BitStarz reopened their account after they asked for a block over gambling addiction, then let them lose €12,850.

The mediator found no proof they had told the casino about a gambling problem before it reopened. A player from Australia says BitStarz kept about A$2,500, saying they had another account.

BitStarz says that account was self-excluded in May 2025, while the player says support gave them the login. The mediator now treats it as a self-exclusion failure and has asked about refunding losses.

What you can do

Case files in this category — click a tag to filter

Cases

2026-08-06 BitStarz: Confiscated Winnings · A$2,500
A player from Australia says BitStarz refused to pay about $2,500 in winnings, saying they had another account, then closed the account after returning a $300 deposit.
Ongoing
2026-07-15 BitStarz: Self-Exclusion Failures · €12,850
A player from Germany says BitStarz reopened their account after they had asked for a block over gambling addiction, then let them deposit and lose €12,850 by Apple Pay with no checks.
Rejected