Crypto Casino Complaint Cases cryptocasino.cc — the crypto casino complaints registry

Crypto Casino Complaints / CoinCasino / Self-Exclusion Failures

CoinCasino: Self-Exclusion Failures

None of the 3 cases has ended in the player's favour; 1 was rejected, 1 ended unresolved and 1 is still open.

3 cases on file about CoinCasino and self-exclusion. A player from Portugal says that after self-excluding in September 2025 they opened and fully verified three more accounts with the same ID.

CoinCasino promised to refund deposits on one of them, but the player says only $20 was paid, and the mediator faulted the casino for not enforcing the exclusion.

A player from Australia lost their case because the block request didn't say the reason was a gambling problem. A Dutch player says her account was reopened a year after she self-excluded, and she lost about €1,000; that case is still open.

What you can do

Case files in this category — click a tag to filter

Cases

2026-10-06 CoinCasino: Self-Exclusion Failures · about €1,000
A player from the Netherlands says she asked CoinCasino to self-exclude about a year ago because of gambling problems, then this October received emails saying her account had been reopened, and went on to lose roughly 1,000 euros.
Ongoing
2026-05-28 CoinCasino: Self-Exclusion Failures · A$3,600
A player from Australia says they emailed CoinCasino asking for their account to be blocked and never reopened, and that five days later it was still open and taking deposits.
Rejected
2025-10-02 CoinCasino: Self-Exclusion Failures · €3,700
A player from Portugal with a gambling addiction says that after self-excluding from CoinCasino in September 2025 they were able to open and fully verify three more accounts with the same ID.
Unresolved