Crypto Casino Complaints / Rakebit / Self-Exclusion Failures
1 of 7 cases ended in the player's favour; 1 was rejected, 1 closed without a reply and 4 are still open.
7 cases on file about gambling harm at Rakebit. Six players say they asked for their account to be closed for good and were offered a short break, a temporary closure or bonuses from a VIP manager instead, while they kept depositing.
In one, Rakebit refunded €884.86 in net losses after the mediator checked the dates. Another was rejected because the player had asked for limits and breaks but never told the casino she had a gambling problem.
Four are still open. In two, the mediator backs a refund, though in one of those Rakebit says a $300 VIP bonus settled it.
In another, Rakebit points to a 72-hour closure rule in its terms.
Case files in this category — click a tag to filter