Crypto Casino Complaints / Stake.com / Self-Exclusion Failures
1 of 6 cases ended in the player's favour; 4 were rejected and 1 ended unresolved.
6 cases on file about gambling harm. Three players say they asked Stake in chat or by email to block them and it didn't happen.
In one, Stake refunded the player's deposits after the mediator recommended it. In another, Stake said it had shown the player the right steps, and the case ended unresolved.
The third was rejected: the chat request was never followed up by email and was too old to check.
The other three were rejected too. One player opened a new account after self-excluding, using changed details, the mediator found.
One, who lost about 1.44 million USDT, had never told Stake outright about a gambling problem. And a player from France, which Stake's terms exclude, says they got hooked with no limits on offer; a regulator ruled for Stake.
Case files in this category — click a tag to filter