Crypto Casino Complaints / Instant Casino / Self-Exclusion Failures
None of the 5 cases has ended in the player's favour; 2 were rejected and 3 ended unresolved.
5 cases on file where players say Instant Casino let them keep playing after they asked to stop.
In two, the mediator read the emails and found the player had only asked to close the account, without mentioning a gambling problem; the casino gave a 24-hour cooling-off period instead.
In a third, from Andorra, the mediator found the email did mention a gambling problem, and Instant Casino then stopped answering.
A Spanish player says an account the casino confirmed as self-excluded opened again after about five months, and they lost about €7,500.
An Italian player asked what happened after a 2025 closure request; the casino said the account closed within hours but shared no records.
Case files in this category — click a tag to filter