Crypto Casino Complaint Cases cryptocasino.cc — the crypto casino complaints registry

Crypto Casino Complaints / Shuffle / Self-Exclusion Failures

Shuffle: Self-Exclusion Failures

None of the 3 cases has ended in the player's favour; 2 were rejected and 1 closed without a reply.

3 cases on file about self-exclusion. In one, a player told live chat they had a gambling addiction and wanted the account closed, then made more than ten deposits.

Shuffle said its agent asked the player to choose an exclusion length and the player left the chat first; the mediator agreed, so no refund was due, though the account is now closed for good.

In another, a self-excluded player opened a second account with the same details and lost about $2,300; the only written mention of addiction came after the losses.

In the third, Shuffle promised to return 0.95 SOL sent to a self-excluded account, and the player stopped replying before saying whether it came back.

What you can do

Case files in this category — click a tag to filter

Cases

2026-10-01 Shuffle: Self-Exclusion Failures · 0.95 SOL
A player from Ireland says they sent 0.95 SOL from an exchange to their Shuffle account around 8 September 2026, while the account was self-excluded and blocked.
Abandoned
2026-06-29 Shuffle: Self-Exclusion Failures · $23,000
A player from Spain says Shuffle had already barred them for a gambling addiction, then kept emailing promotions.
Rejected
2026-06-18 Shuffle: Self-Exclusion Failures · C$1,000
A player from Canada says they told Shuffle's live chat on 16 June that they had a gambling addiction and needed the account closed permanently and urgently.
Rejected