Crypto Casino Complaint Cases cryptocasino.cc — the crypto casino complaints registry

Crypto Casino Complaints / Rollbit / Self-Exclusion Failures

Self-Exclusion Failures: 1,500 SOL (the player puts losses at over $120,000) at Rollbit

StatusUnresolved
Amount1,500 SOL (the player puts losses at over $120,000)
PlayerCanada (Quebec)
Opened2026-06-29
Resolution time8 days

What Happened

A player from Quebec says they self-excluded at Rollbit over a gambling problem, then opened three new accounts while the exclusion was active. According to the player, Rollbit ran KYC on each one against the same ID and still let them deposit, leading to over $120,000 in net losses in two weeks. They asked for a refund, a permanent block and their records kept.

How It Developed

  • 2026-06-29Complaint opened. The player said Rollbit's compliance team had acknowledged the issue but quoted a 20-business-day reply time.
  • 2026-06-30The player said they could still log in to every account, that each passed ID checks in their own name, and that Rollbit sends no email when you self-exclude.
  • 2026-07-07The mediator closed the case unresolved without contacting Rollbit, citing more than 25 earlier cases the casino ignored. The player was pointed to the Curaçao Gaming Authority.
Unresolved

Rollbit has a record of ignoring Casino.guru, so the case closed without its input. The player was sent to the Curaçao regulator.

What Has (and Hasn't) Helped

Nothing here: the mediator did not even try, because Rollbit has ignored more than 25 earlier complaints. Take a case like this straight to the licensing regulator, and add a blocking tool such as BetBlocker so new sign-ups are harder.

Same issue, other cases

Related Cases

2021-09-19 Rollbit: Self-Exclusion Failures · €447
A player from Sweden says they told Rollbit about a gambling addiction, yet the casino let them go on depositing and losing money.
Unresolved
2022-12-08 Rollbit: Self-Exclusion Failures · €3,500
A player from the Netherlands says they self-excluded from Rollbit twice because of a gambling problem, yet could still open new accounts and play.
Unresolved
2020-05-15 Stake.com: Self-Exclusion Failures · £303.14
A player from the UK says they told Stake on 28 March 2020 that they had a gambling problem and asked to be shut out for good.
Resolved
2020-08-05 Fairspin: Self-Exclusion Failures · $5,000
A player from Australia says Fairspin kept taking her deposits although her country is on its restricted list, and did not close her account when she told support she had a gambling addiction.
Unresolved